From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: c70a3c1115e943787a9936935eba8d4a62d293ae0e5b2a817f3d133ad0bc2bcc
Message ID: <199805141609.MAA22580@camel8.mindspring.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-05-14 16:12:57 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 09:12:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 09:12:57 -0700 (PDT)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Public Key Royalties
Message-ID: <199805141609.MAA22580@camel8.mindspring.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
In a recent GAO report on governmental funding of university research
there is this note:
In fiscal year 1996, the commercialization of the public key encryption
method, which was developed under grants from the Navy and NSF,
resulted in $271,875 in royalties to MIT.
Does this refer to RSA or PGP? Did the Navy underwrite RSA's PK work?
If so does the USG have a secret stake in PGP, Network Associates
and RSA?
More: did the Navy guide PK researchers based on the secret UK PK work
before Diffie-Hellman?
The full report:
http://jya.com/rced-98-126.txt (184K)
Return to May 1998
Return to “John Young <jya@pipeline.com>”
1998-05-14 (Thu, 14 May 1998 09:12:57 -0700 (PDT)) - Public Key Royalties - John Young <jya@pipeline.com>