1998-06-29 - Re: Finally… a One-Time-Pad implementation that works!!!

Header Data

From: Bryan Waters <waters@ultimateprivacy.com>
To: “Geoffrey C. Grabow” <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 28a30a0594308f1b35f347283738c2abb8bb66dacea4097ca9969c9c4e317da9
Message ID: <199806291836.OAA02926@omniwork.com>
Reply To: <Version.32.19980627174733.00f29ee0@pop6.ibm.net>
UTC Datetime: 1998-06-29 18:36:54 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 11:36:54 -0700 (PDT)

Raw message

From: Bryan Waters <waters@ultimateprivacy.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 11:36:54 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Geoffrey C. Grabow" <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Finally... a One-Time-Pad implementation that works!!!
In-Reply-To: <Version.32.19980627174733.00f29ee0@pop6.ibm.net>
Message-ID: <199806291836.OAA02926@omniwork.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 05:49 PM 6/27/98 -0400, Geoffrey C. Grabow wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>TriStrata has announced that is has a product that provides OTP without the
>pad distribution problem.  The product also has a unique key-recovery
>system.  Check out:
>
>
>http://www.tristrata.com
>
>for details.
>
I wish there were more details.  Namely how they generate their 10^30 byte
"virtual keystream".
In order to be a true one-time pad the keystream needs to be completely
random, this looks more like a psuedo-random stream cypher to me.  But it
should be fast and still might be secure.  

As a competing one-time pad vendor I don't want to be a pot calling the
kettle black, but If I've learned anything from the cypherpunks, it's prove
it.  Which is what we've tried to do.


Bryan Waters                                    http://www.ultimateprivacy.com
Director of Marketing                    Voice: 512-305-0505 Fax: 512-305-0506
Ultimate Privacy Corporation       3925 W Braker Ln #305, Austin, TX, 78759  





Thread