1998-06-05 - Re: NEWS - NRA Charles Heston speech

Header Data

From: StanSqncrs@aol.com
To: Cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 315411a9846ab55e0e05a74817227a3d5d0606952c2f921e6a4af4460d80b7d5
Message ID: <93c4594e.35778eca@aol.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-06-05 06:23:39 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 4 Jun 1998 23:23:39 -0700 (PDT)

Raw message

From: StanSqncrs@aol.com
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 1998 23:23:39 -0700 (PDT)
To: Cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: NEWS - NRA Charles Heston speech
Message-ID: <93c4594e.35778eca@aol.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


McVeigh is alot better than Heston (at lying-type propaganda.  I couldn't even
call McVeigh's "lying-type."  It was filled with MUCH more fact than Heston's
speech.)

The glaring over-all problem I see with his speech, is his hypocracy when it
comes to the 1st amendment (yea, I know he *claimed* to be a 1st amendments
rights supporter, BUT his actions (the rest of the speech) counters that
claim.)

Here's why they want to remove our freedom of speech.  It's because - dig this
Cypherpunks - 'The pen is mightier than the sword.'  If they take away our
ability to speak, and they keep their silly guns, guess what.  Then they have
the more powerful weapon.  And dig this - yes it IS that simple.

Stan





Thread