From: Richard Storey <cognitus@earthlink.net>
To: Mark Hedges <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 1a00e599582c4fbc1f0caee626d0aeb8b26d162d4e7b2fdf2c8fd96df2b839bb
Message ID: <35BF1A96.BC2DBCF5@earthlink.net>
Reply To: <Pine.SOL.3.96.980729020650.14013C-100000@rigel.infonex.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-07-29 12:47:38 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1998 05:47:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: Richard Storey <cognitus@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1998 05:47:38 -0700 (PDT)
To: Mark Hedges <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: infant SSN assignment (whoops)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.96.980729020650.14013C-100000@rigel.infonex.com>
Message-ID: <35BF1A96.BC2DBCF5@earthlink.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I remember discussing the changes with a friend around 1991. At the time
I was reading the changes noted to the law in IRS publication no. 17. I
believe it is also noted on Form 1040 (look in the area used for
children's SSN, it should be ref. in the instructions). Between the two
of these, you should get a pointer to the code, and all of these are
available online. The IRS is the only agency, that I have know, of using
this law and, again, I think that congress made it law c. '91.
Richard Storey
Mark Hedges wrote:
>
> Could someone kindly point toward an authoritative resource which proves
> assignment of SSN's to newborns is mandatory? Gratzi. -hedges-
Return to July 1998
Return to “Richard Storey <cognitus@earthlink.net>”
Unknown thread root