From: Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@stud.uni-muenchen.de>
To: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Message Hash: b2a1f9bca3832b297175dcb39f266ef1767e289847c5436eae2262273d1faa6e
Message ID: <359BAE16.58832781@stud.uni-muenchen.de>
Reply To: <199807021125.HAA06437@camel7.mindspring.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-07-02 15:58:30 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 2 Jul 1998 08:58:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@stud.uni-muenchen.de>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 1998 08:58:30 -0700 (PDT)
To: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Subject: Re: IE Frees Crypto
In-Reply-To: <199807021125.HAA06437@camel7.mindspring.com>
Message-ID: <359BAE16.58832781@stud.uni-muenchen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
John Young wrote:
>
> Source: http://go2.guardian.co.uk/paper.html
>
> The Guardian Online, Microfile, July 2, 1998
>
> access to encrypted messages. Ireland places no
> restrictions on the use, import or export of encryption
> products. Individuals can choose to offer a plain text
> version of the encrypted document or hand over a key,
> if a search warrant is proffered. The document was
I have a language problem. Does this mean that the authority
depends on the honesty of the individual who hands over
a plain text saying that it corresponds to the ciphertext
or else how is the intent of the authority to obtain the
true plain text to be achieved?
M. K. Shen
Return to July 1998
Return to “Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@stud.uni-muenchen.de>”