1998-07-09 - Re: Covert Access to Data and ID
Header Data
From: Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@stud.uni-muenchen.de>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: de0fed67f2b34425d197528a1e7bdb22b81b81a8b5081342580762aa8ce10206
Message ID: <35A47BD1.1F51A0D5@stud.uni-muenchen.de>
Reply To: <199807081547.LAA21623@camel14.mindspring.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-07-09 08:14:25 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 01:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
Raw message
From: Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@stud.uni-muenchen.de>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 01:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Covert Access to Data and ID
In-Reply-To: <199807081547.LAA21623@camel14.mindspring.com>
Message-ID: <35A47BD1.1F51A0D5@stud.uni-muenchen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
John Young wrote:
> Thus, the more general question Dave has raised is how
> widespread is the development and implementation of
> technolgies for covert surveillance on the Web and in
> desktop boxes -- happily spreading quietly while attention
> is focussed on the very encryption which it will circumvent?
I don't know whether it is relevant but there is recently an
announcement of a conference on intrusion detection. Perhaps
one gets some relevant research results there presented.
M. K. Shen
Thread
Return to July 1998
- Return to “Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>”
- Return to “attila <attila@hun.org>”
- Return to “John Young <jya@pipeline.com>”
Return to “Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@stud.uni-muenchen.de>”
- 1998-07-08 (Wed, 8 Jul 1998 12:12:17 -0700 (PDT)) - Covert Access to Data and ID - John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
- 1998-07-08 (Wed, 8 Jul 1998 14:38:58 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Covert Access to Data and ID - Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
- 1998-07-09 (Thu, 9 Jul 1998 01:14:25 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Covert Access to Data and ID - Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@stud.uni-muenchen.de>
- 1998-07-19 (Sun, 19 Jul 1998 12:29:13 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Covert Access to Data and ID - attila <attila@hun.org>