1998-07-15 - Stan & Tim

Header Data

From: Anonymous <remailer@htp.org>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: df23ab851caadec225893769d316eacf2b2282b497d14d1a9723481966df6e94
Message ID: <19980715015501.29920.qmail@nsm.htp.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-07-15 01:55:41 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 14 Jul 1998 18:55:41 -0700 (PDT)

Raw message

From: Anonymous <remailer@htp.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 1998 18:55:41 -0700 (PDT)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Stan & Tim
Message-ID: <19980715015501.29920.qmail@nsm.htp.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Hints that an anonymous poster is Tim may be red herrings. Given Stan's recent "research" into Xian conspiracy,
he may have other enemies than Tim...
[cypherpunk issue: how do you tell that anonymous posts aren't really anonymous?]

That said, I'm surprised at the number of "SPANK" emails directed at Stan. (Especially since they're from
anonymous accounts which he just said he has killfiled. Duh!)

I find some of his posts amusing, some edifying, some boring, but mostly not "clueless", unlike the following
cascade which I've paraphrased slightly:

some nobody said:
> another nobody said:
>> yet another nobody said:
>>> still more nobody said:
>>>> I think Stan is clueless
>>> Me Too.
>> Me Too!
> Me Too!!!





Thread