From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 76333f5f8db2a0ac7b5d3cc835a3ea2653cdefbace3536eb2125ec0a123e166f
Message ID: <199808270237.EAA21620@replay.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-08-27 02:37:17 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1998 19:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1998 19:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: LACC: Re: Is hate code speech?
Message-ID: <199808270237.EAA21620@replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Wed, 26 Aug 1998, Dan Stromberg wrote:
>
> William H. Geiger III wrote:
> > >Sad that I wasted this much time responding.
> >
> > Why, because I challenge your PC dogma and require to to rationally
> > justify it? We have an old saying here "If you are scared son, then say
> > you are scared". If you are unable to rationally and objectively justify
> > your PC dogma than just say so.
>
> Smirk. /I'm terrified/ I've said it before, and I'll say it again:
>
> Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty, and the pig likes it.
That's why I'm not wrestling with you. I'll just get dirty, and you'll
enjoy it.
Return to August 1998
Return to “Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>”
1998-08-27 (Wed, 26 Aug 1998 19:37:17 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: LACC: Re: Is hate code speech? - Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>