From: “Brown, R Ken” <brownrk1@texaco.com>
To: Tim Griffiths <bbt@mudspring.uplb.edu.ph>
Message Hash: 7956d387a9b0c7c59295d4b9525abdc7866b90b50330430ff60f4fdc5aad2aee
Message ID: <896C7C3540C3D111AB9F00805FA78CE2013F837A@MSX11002>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-08-21 05:53:10 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1998 22:53:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Brown, R Ken" <brownrk1@texaco.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1998 22:53:10 -0700 (PDT)
To: Tim Griffiths <bbt@mudspring.uplb.edu.ph>
Subject: RE: your mail
Message-ID: <896C7C3540C3D111AB9F00805FA78CE2013F837A@MSX11002>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> Bernardo B. Terrado[SMTP:bbt@mudspring.uplb.edu.ph]
>
> It's funny, some of the mails sent by some mailers are being
> referred by some as a troll. WHY?
It is a variant spelling of the word "trawl" - a large
fishing net dragged behind a ship ("trawler") to catch
lots of fish (and prawns and shrimps and dolphins and
seals and turtles and penguins...)
So it is a message sent out in the hope of catching lots of
replies, maybe to get email addresses for a mailing list
or just for the fun of starting a flame war.
For example, if I posted my real opinion of the US
conservative attitude to guns, abortion, race, socialism
or the Bell Curve here, I would be trawling. Sorry, trolling.
Not to mention breaking my employers rules about
using email for flames or political comment.
So I won't. From this id at any rate :-)
The word is used in other contexts - for example
in the British Civil Service an internal job ad circulated to
many offices is called a "trawl".
Ken
Return to August 1998
Return to ““Brown, R Ken” <brownrk1@texaco.com>”
1998-08-21 (Thu, 20 Aug 1998 22:53:10 -0700 (PDT)) - RE: your mail - “Brown, R Ken” <brownrk1@texaco.com>