From: “Enzo Michelangeli” <em@who.net>
To: <honig@sprynet.com>
Message Hash: 8105a5428c673d222904a0942f26ee1fed7b446586b1872a68a97c8722f31a65
Message ID: <00bf01bdc19d$eb2c09c0$88004bca@home>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-08-07 00:53:22 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 6 Aug 1998 17:53:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Enzo Michelangeli" <em@who.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 1998 17:53:22 -0700 (PDT)
To: <honig@sprynet.com>
Subject: Re: Noise source processing
Message-ID: <00bf01bdc19d$eb2c09c0$88004bca@home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----Original Message-----
From: David Honig <honig@sprynet.com>
Date: Friday, August 07, 1998 1:58 AM
>>What about an analog filter placed before the digitizer?
>
>The engineering issue is this: no matter how great you filter out
>the junk, you don't have a perfect analog measurement to start with.
>(Note that filtering out junk reduces info content).
Well, linear analog filters are reversible, so, by themselves, they neither
destroy nor create information. In practice they may add some noise of their
own, drowning the original signal, but in our case this is good, not bad :-)
The relationship between entropy and reversibility is a deep one, of course.
That's also why reversible computing can, among other things, reduce the
power consumption without any theoretical limit.
Enzo
Return to August 1998
Return to ““Enzo Michelangeli” <em@who.net>”
1998-08-07 (Thu, 6 Aug 1998 17:53:22 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Noise source processing - “Enzo Michelangeli” <em@who.net>