From: Xcott Craver <caj@math.niu.edu>
To: “Trei, Peter” <ptrei@securitydynamics.com>
Message Hash: beab26f1ea5a5cbcbabe1bee56b5360813f6a4e4fb79af6c51516ab60705c999
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.980810150113.12985A-100000@baker>
Reply To: <D104150098E6D111B7830000F8D90AE8017958@exna02.securitydynamics.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-08-10 20:20:14 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1998 13:20:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: Xcott Craver <caj@math.niu.edu>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1998 13:20:14 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Trei, Peter" <ptrei@securitydynamics.com>
Subject: Re: I'm from the government, and I'm here to control your email....
In-Reply-To: <D104150098E6D111B7830000F8D90AE8017958@exna02.securitydynamics.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.980810150113.12985A-100000@baker>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Mon, 10 Aug 1998, Trei, Peter wrote:
> Once everyone has an government registered email address, it
> will be a simple matter to forbid the use of uncontrolled email
> addresses (for either sending or receiving) at least within the
> US. It's to be expected that government agencies will refuse to
> send to any other address.
I don't know how easy this would be. The Govt would be going
up against some pretty heavy businesses if they wanted to
eliminate all but their own email addresses. I can see them
pushing a standard by only acknowledgeing "postal" addresses,
and probably pushing some kind of cost, since for obvious
reasons, these email addresses would have to be managed by
the govts own servers.
I predict that the idea will go through, the USPS will
consider charging people based on the space their incoming
mail takes up, but change to a charge on outgoing mail after
everyone raises a stink.
Then, some clever person will push a bill through congress
forcing all commercial email to be sent from a postal email
address, forcing spammers to pay a bulk rate and provide
both a physical and internet return address.
-Caj
Return to August 1998
Return to “Xcott Craver <caj@math.niu.edu>”