1998-08-31 - Re:

Header Data

From: jkthomson <jkthomson@bigfoot.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: ffae6d82d446c89319242b58ec9409f38a509305af807ef0b8bdf4e6d03a2701
Message ID: <3.0.3.32.19980831144238.006f80d0@dowco.com>
Reply To: <67d557e1.35eb0495@aol.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-08-31 21:41:53 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1998 14:41:53 -0700 (PDT)

Raw message

From: jkthomson <jkthomson@bigfoot.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1998 14:41:53 -0700 (PDT)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re:
In-Reply-To: <67d557e1.35eb0495@aol.com>
Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.19980831144238.006f80d0@dowco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 04:16 PM 8/31/98 EDT, ILovToHack@aol.com wrote:
>Ibelive by spooks he ment goverment agents not a racial slur so lay off.

trust me, it's ok, he was using '32-bit AOL' to post his message, so
EVERYONE but you realized that he was talking about garbage anyway.  maybe
AOL64 will have a clue(tm) built in.


an appeal to listmembers:

listmembers, can't we make this list 'request for access'?  iLoV2HaCk and
his AOL ilk are getting a little too 'elite' and 'k-rad' for me. pipebombs,
posters, spooks, music, what the hell is happening to this list?  I know
that I mainly lurk, but don't you think that having to request to join this
list may filter out the worst of the AOL (et al) newbies?  they obviously
cannot get a clue(tm) and continue to cause a landslide of off-topic
(albeit funny) posts that ridicule them, and keep this list awash in
non-cypherpunkish dialogue.  

oh, and I am also sorry for perpetuating this thread.


  

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 james 'keith' thomson <jkthomson@bigfoot.com>  www.bigfoot.com/~ceildh
 jkthomson:C181 991A 405C EAFB 2C46 79B5 B1DC DB78 8196 122D [06.07.98]
 ceildh   :1D79 59AF ED75 5945 6003 8240 DA34 ACCA 9DE4 6BC9 [05.14.98]
 ICQ:746241 <keys> at pgp.mit.edu     ...and former sysop of tnbnog BBS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The people to worry about are not those who openly disagree with you,
but those who disagree with you who are too cowardly to let you know.
=======================================================================





Thread