From: Jim Burnes <jvb@ssds.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 21:00:50 +0800
To: David Emery <die@die.com>
Subject: Re: arms collectors...
In-Reply-To: <19980925195613.A3801@die.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980925194047.1188A-100000@jb3.fastrans.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



On Fri, 25 Sep 1998, David Emery wrote:

> ----- Forwarded message from "Thomas B. Roach" <sigint@thegrid.net> -----
> 
> 
> Washington Times, 25 Sep 98
> Operable missile seized in customs
> By Bill Gertz THE WASHINGTON TIMES
> 
> U.S.  and British authorities are investigating how a Russian-design
> Scud missile was imported illegally by a weapons collector in
> California, The Washington Times has learned.
> 
> "This is a full-blown missile," said John Hensley, a senior agent of the
> U.S.  Customs Service in Los Angeles.  "The only thing missing is the
> warhead."
> 
> A Scud B missile and its mobile transporter-erector launcher --minus the
> warhead -- were seized Sept.  2 by customs agents in Port Hueneme,
> Calif., about 35 miles north of Los Angeles, said officials familiar
> with the case.
> 

Scuze me for picking nits, but if the missile doesn't have a
warhead then its just a rocket (plus some guidance systems).

When does a rocket become a "weapon of mass destruction"?

Maybe what American officials should be investigating is how US defense
contractors got an export license to sell ICBM components to the ChiCom's. 
I heard it was OK'd by the pres himself -- theorectically for big
campaign donations.

If those missiles are targeted at US, then that would constitute
blatant treason, would it not?

Inquiring minds want to know.

jim