1998-09-21 - Re: ArcotSign (was Re: Does security depend on hardware?)

Header Data

From: Bruce Schneier <schneier@counterpane.com>
To: Ben Laurie <colin@nyx.net>
Message Hash: 0d291c4e19451873050d442509f1106696efdfd19b444bb131c0ba0616125c40
Message ID: <199809221128.GAA19873@mixer.visi.com>
Reply To: <199809220552.XAA17972@nyx10.nyx.net>
UTC Datetime: 1998-09-21 22:27:13 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 06:27:13 +0800

Raw message

From: Bruce Schneier <schneier@counterpane.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 06:27:13 +0800
To: Ben Laurie <colin@nyx.net>
Subject: Re: ArcotSign (was Re: Does security depend on hardware?)
In-Reply-To: <199809220552.XAA17972@nyx10.nyx.net>
Message-ID: <199809221128.GAA19873@mixer.visi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 11:55 AM 9/22/98 +0100, Ben Laurie wrote:
>Colin Plumb wrote:
>> 
>> Doug, I'd just like to thank you for replying.  Even without looking at
your
>> description, the fact that you are willing to talk to doubters and admit
>> the limitations of your technique make me a lot more comfortable believing
>> that you have something.  You don't fit into either of the two standard
>> types of snake-oil salesmen: The "I can't tell you because it's secret"
>> sort, and the "it's totally unbreakable, cures world hunger and
>> disposes of nuclear waste" sort.
>
>Clearly I failed to understand this, then:
>
>"This note doesn't tell everything about our method--we *are* developing
>a commercial product, after all..."
>
>which somehow doesn't translate to "I can't tell you because it's
>secret", it seems.

Well, _I_ think they can explain everything (and we hope to do an academic
paper on the idea), but it's not my decision.

Bruce
**********************************************************************
Bruce Schneier, President, Counterpane Systems     Phone: 612-823-1098
101 E Minnehaha Parkway, Minneapolis, MN  55419      Fax: 612-823-1590
           Free crypto newsletter.  See:  http://www.counterpane.com





Thread