1998-09-16 - RE: Democracy… (fwd)

Header Data

From: Jim Choate <ravage@EINSTEIN.ssz.com>
To: cypherpunks@EINSTEIN.ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Message Hash: 4ef911f98296c5614627bf324eeafd9f5206fd599feef8c79ee621ee428456e2
Message ID: <199809161903.OAA08336@einstein.ssz.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-09-16 05:38:14 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1998 13:38:14 +0800

Raw message

From: Jim Choate <ravage@EINSTEIN.ssz.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1998 13:38:14 +0800
To: cypherpunks@EINSTEIN.ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Subject: RE: Democracy... (fwd)
Message-ID: <199809161903.OAA08336@einstein.ssz.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text



Forwarded message:

> From: Matthew James Gering <mgering@ecosystems.net>
> Subject: RE: Democracy...
> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1998 11:00:09 -0700

> Unless you can show me a religion that does not involve a god or gods,
> and although etymologically unjustified I would claim one that does not
> involve *faith*, then I would say you could NOT be both an atheist and
> religious. Agnostic perhaps, but not an atheist. You can be
> contradictory and hypocritical and claim you are many things, but we are
> talking about a coherent philosophy.

Try pantheism. If one fundamentaly believes that god does not exist, which
clearly involves faith, then yes it is a religion. A religion is a belief
system that provides a relationship between the individual and the totality
of all else (the cosmos if you'll allow me).

By your view an agnostic can't be religion since it is the recognition of
a *lack* of faith, clearly something you require to be religous. An atheist
says that god could exist but doesn't - clearly an act of faith.

There are fundamentaly two types of religions, those that recognize some for
of transcendance and those that don't. Quibbling over what is the 'correct'
form of transcendence is as irrelevant as arguing over the 'correct'
religion.

In either case the same failure to understand human psychology is committed.
In short it is the axiomatic assumption that there *is* a single anything
that will satisfy everyone.

> You can be both spiritual and an atheist. Spirituality does not require
> faith in any external mystical element or being.

What do you mean by 'spiritual'? Are you refering to a ghost-in-the-machine
either at the individual or cosmological level? Whether one believes that
mystical element is external (which if you understood God would clearly be
seen to be a non sequitar with the rest of your argument) or internal is 
irrelevant.


    ____________________________________________________________________

                            The seeker is a finder.

                                     Ancient Persian Proverb

       The Armadillo Group       ,::////;::-.          James Choate
       Austin, Tx               /:'///// ``::>/|/      ravage@ssz.com
       www.ssz.com            .',  ||||    `/( e\      512-451-7087
                           -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'-
    --------------------------------------------------------------------





Thread