From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: 53564905e277b880b726282c3f27d4ac7e6011b29586fdc95687c3cd52aabf80
Message ID: <199809131855.UAA18056@replay.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-09-13 05:56:36 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1998 13:56:36 +0800
From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1998 13:56:36 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: No Subject
Message-ID: <199809131855.UAA18056@replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
How about a line-of-sight (LOS) infrared network, a neighbor-net?
Always thought this could be a method for a local technical
entrepreneur to fund and share their personal T-1 link or for
some small network enterprise to avoid local and US federal
regulations and compete with the big cable and telephone
companies. Appears that LOS infrared is currently unregulated
and could be encrypted.
Get enough people in a neighborhood to put LOS infrared
relays on top of their houses, allow them to tap in, and feed this
neighbor-net from some central point that is equipped with
a more conventional link.
I dunno why infrared, which theoretically has much more
capacity than a phone line or coax cable, seems currently so slow,
i.e., less than 10 MB in many commercial offerings. I've no cost
estimate for the roof top boxes. Heavy wet weather, fog, rain,
snow obviously can affect LOS infrared, esp. low power.
Personally, I would like more choices than just the phone and cable
lines, especially something that is locally controlled. However, I
imagine that if any significant traffic was generated over such
infrared or wireless neighbor-nets, the Feds would eventually
step in and regulate them. They'd probably want to regulate the
traffic over a taut string, between paper cups.
Return to September 1998
Return to “Michael Motyka <mmotyka@lsil.com>”