From: “Brian B. Riley” <brianbr@together.net>
To: “Jim Choate” <cypherpunks@einstein.ssz.com>
Message Hash: 766461c9e9d7c4d48774f58604dd1734f2fd653e211f6ae5e20f3c543f49c5ad
Message ID: <199809130003.UAA29856@mx01.together.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-09-12 11:05:14 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1998 19:05:14 +0800
From: "Brian B. Riley" <brianbr@together.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1998 19:05:14 +0800
To: "Jim Choate" <cypherpunks@einstein.ssz.com>
Subject: Re: radio net (fwd)
Message-ID: <199809130003.UAA29856@mx01.together.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On 9/9/98 8:39 AM, Jim Choate (ravage@einstein.ssz.com) passed this
wisdom:
>Forwarded message:
>
>> Date: Wed, 09 Sep 1998 00:51:49 -0700
>> From: "William J. Hartwell" <billh@ibag.com>
>> Subject: Re: radio net
>
>> I think a radio network linked to the Amateur networks sending secure
>> packets,
>> using tunneling or maybe just encrypted traffic (There may be some FCC
>> rules regarding this.
>
>The FCC prohibits the transmission of encrypted data via analog or digital
>signals by amateurs.
The FCC prohibits the use of transmissions encoded specifically to
obscure the content of the traffic (which is exactly what our reason for
using encryption would be), in essence they prohibit using encrypted
transmisions. However, by wording the ruling that way they leave the door
open for things like the ham radio satellite command channel uplinks
being encrypted for security reasons ... but to do so they must, upon
request, be able to provide the Friendly Chocolate Company with their
keys.
Brian B. Riley --> http://members.macconnect.com/~brianbr
For PGP Keys <mailto:brianbr@together.net?subject=Get%20PGP%20Key>
"For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism."
Return to September 1998
Return to ““Brian B. Riley” <brianbr@together.net>”
1998-09-12 (Sat, 12 Sep 1998 19:05:14 +0800) - Re: radio net (fwd) - “Brian B. Riley” <brianbr@together.net>