From: “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: 9d0dbdf72abb6360bddbfc7fa36c0d47bce573dedbf3da7bfddcdf5fee4580ee
Message ID: <199809070805.EAA21826@domains.invweb.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-09-07 08:07:33 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1998 16:07:33 +0800
From: "William H. Geiger III" <whgiii@invweb.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1998 16:07:33 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: KRAP is at it in the IETF
Message-ID: <199809070805.EAA21826@domains.invweb.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hello,
It has come to my attention that the KRAP (key recovery alliance program)
has submitted an I-D (internet draft) to the IETF for adding GAK
(government access to keys) to the IPSEC protocols:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-rfced-exp-markham-00.txt
ISAKMP Key Recovery Extensions
<draft-rfced-exp-markham-00.txt>
7. AUTHOR INFORMATION
Tom Markham
Secure Computing Corp
2675 Long Lake Road
Roseville, MN 55113 USA
Phone: 651.628.2754, Fax: 651.628.2701
EMail: tom_markham@securecomputing.com
I consider this a perversion of the standards process of the IETF to
advance a political agenda which must be stopped at all cost.
Below are the e-mail addresses of some people that you should write
(politely) expressing your objections to any such additions to the
protocols:
IPSEC Chairs:
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Robert Moskowitz <rgm@icsa.net>
Security Area Directors:
Jeffrey Schiller <jis@mit.edu>
Marcus Leech <mlecch@nortel.ca>
As I mentioned before, be polite. These people are not the ones proposing
GAK be added to the IPSEC protocols. They have put a lot of time and
effort in forwarding the cause for strong encryption. They should be made
aware of the communities objections to these attempts by KRAP.
Thanks,
- --
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
William H. Geiger III http://www.openpgp.net
Geiger Consulting Cooking With Warp 4.0
Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice
PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail.
OS/2 PGP 5.0 at: http://www.openpgp.net/pgp.html
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
Tag-O-Matic: It's OS/2, Jim, but not OS/2 as we know it.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a-sha1
Charset: cp850
Comment: Registered_User_E-Secure_v1.1b1_ES000000
iQCVAwUBNfOVk49Co1n+aLhhAQFJwwP+O4vrZVKFpOG8vCHFwbDuPIv/99AhBnKF
RK/Ikc5y2gGKq9hfxkTb4o77YUrDaEGkYUPHk+ZC57Oag0Lu1v6W1EAbQ5T4RpzH
JWYXOonQmbqw5rH0h6brzqrH3ep9Ej9DR0gv4mGgIfSNlJSUu6TWO5ZHXKWiE4yy
5flH0Ngg/TI=
=EzNL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to September 1998
Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>”
1998-09-07 (Mon, 7 Sep 1998 16:07:33 +0800) - KRAP is at it in the IETF - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>