1998-09-14 - [NYT] FCC Extends CALEA Deadline

Header Data

From: bill.stewart@pobox.com
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Message Hash: bde12e6c28b0db0bfb528f799cefd46bd497795a7d39c1930ddeb7773fcf9066
Message ID: <3.0.5.32.19980914104107.0089f220@idiom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-09-14 05:54:12 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 13:54:12 +0800

Raw message

From: bill.stewart@pobox.com
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 13:54:12 +0800
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Subject: [NYT] FCC Extends CALEA Deadline
Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.19980914104107.0089f220@idiom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



>From the New Yawk Times, probably Friday or Saturday:
WIRETAP DELAYED - [New York Times, C14.] In a setback for the F.B.I., 
the Federal Communications Commission has given the telecommunications 
industry an additional 20 months to comply with a 
Federal law meant to bring law-enforcement surveillance into the
digital age. But in extending the deadline the commission deferred 
action on some of the most disputed facets of the issue, which has pitted
law-enforcement officials against telephone-equipment manufacturers, 
network-service providers and privacy-rights advocates. 
The Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act was intended to 
address complaints by the F.B.I. and local law-enforcement agencies
that were rapidly losing their ability to conduct wiretaps and other 
forms of electronic surveillance in the face of modern digital and 
wireless communications networks. But industry groups had long warned 
that they would be unable to meet the approaching deadline for complying
with the law by installing the software and hardware that would allow 
for court-authorized surveillance on modern networks. 
The F.C.C. extended the deadline to June 30, 2000. 
"This ruling is really a prelude to the privacy fight," said James X. Dempsey, 
a telecommunications expert. "For now the commission has given itself 
and the industry some breathing room. They've said, 
'Don't rush into these additional surveillance areas.'" 
The decision came in response to a request for a deadline extension 
that was filed in March in a joint petition by AT&T
Wireless Services, Lucent Technologies and Ericsson. 





Thread