From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
To: Anonymous <nobody@anon.olymp.org>
Message Hash: d671e2d9d97370ec61ea13f77aa3d79618b308e1d9d588aabf359438a9eff4bd
Message ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.980909120926.27131W-100000@well.com>
Reply To: <ed4d64ff287d4e98c0e76cdc3d0e33cf@anonymous>
UTC Datetime: 1998-09-09 06:16:59 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1998 14:16:59 +0800
From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1998 14:16:59 +0800
To: Anonymous <nobody@anon.olymp.org>
Subject: Carl Johnson's private key
In-Reply-To: <ed4d64ff287d4e98c0e76cdc3d0e33cf@anonymous>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.980909120926.27131W-100000@well.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I make that point in my article, but have not seen truthmonger's private
key posted. Care to forward it to me?
http://cgi.pathfinder.com/netly/0,2326,201980909-14593,00.html
On Wed, 9 Sep 1998, Anonymous wrote:
> Dear Mr Gordon,
>
> When I checked the
> digital signature on the Internet death threat using the PGP software
> and JOHNSON'S secret key ring, the computer identified the signature
> as one of the signature keys stored in JOHNSON'S computer. Because
> both the "private" and "public" portions of the "key" were stored on
> JOHNSON'S computer, the message can be authenticated as having been
> generated by the person who possessed this "secret key" and knew the
> correct password. In other words, only the person possessing the
> secret key found on JOHNSON'S computer could have generated the "death
> threat" message.
>
> Why would you claim only one person possessed the secret key? As you
> doubtlessly know, some of the TruthMonger secret keys have been posted
> to Cypherpunks anonymously. This is not authentication. Thank you.
>
>
>
Return to September 1998
Return to “Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>”