1998-09-19 - Re: Clinton’s fake apologies (fwd)

Header Data

From: Anonymous <nobody@remailer.ch>
To: Jim Choate <cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: e59faab2d755cc8885e899780274f9bf26201054cdf08c04603c7f09083d806e
Message ID: <19980919212126.20210.qmail@hades.rpini.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-09-19 08:21:40 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 19 Sep 1998 16:21:40 +0800

Raw message

From: Anonymous <nobody@remailer.ch>
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 1998 16:21:40 +0800
To: Jim Choate <cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: Clinton's fake apologies (fwd)
Message-ID: <19980919212126.20210.qmail@hades.rpini.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




Jim Choate wrote:
> 
> nobody@remailer.ch wrote:
> > Subject: Re: Clinton's fake apologies (fwd)
> 
> > Presumably he should lie to protect the state.
> 
> Then don't take the oath:
> 
> To tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
> 
...

> > So lieing per se isn't the problem.
> 
> No, it's the fact that he took an oath to tell the truth and didn't.
> 
> > Murky water
> > for impeachment, methinks.
> 
> Then you don't think very well.
> 

What? To tell a lie is one thing, but if you preface it with "I'm telling the truth",
then that is really really bad? I still think you're drawing a very fine line.

I'm honoured to draw an ad hominem before revealing that I'm on AOL.

-- an anonymous aol32 user. 





Thread