1998-10-28 - Re: No Subject

Header Data

From: Michael Motyka <mmotyka@lsil.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 0a828a8c1ddcf40b1fdd58353c001d665b0e9d1ef638126f970f623fbe938df7
Message ID: <36378CD4.4E77@lsil.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-10-28 22:18:46 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 06:18:46 +0800

Raw message

From: Michael Motyka <mmotyka@lsil.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 06:18:46 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: No Subject
Message-ID: <36378CD4.4E77@lsil.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



> Shift registers are cracked.
>
OK. But if used prior to another cipher wouldn't it substantially
complicate the job of, say, looking for English letter distributions in
a test decryption?

I like the other explanation of the hash isolating the key bits from the
whitening operation and adequately serving the same purpose as another
source.

> Traditional block ciphers are expensive bleach, take note.
> Unnecessary.
>
Expensive how? In terms of CPU time?
What alternative makes traditional block ciphers obsolete?





Thread