From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 2aa1efb4d440071a7bf00dccbd3aff61b4e8a6ac05f2d6d53cf0c21c541908f3
Message ID: <199810071447.KAA16769@dewdrop2.mindspring.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-10-07 15:05:00 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1998 23:05:00 +0800
From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1998 23:05:00 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Nowhere Justice
Message-ID: <199810071447.KAA16769@dewdrop2.mindspring.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
A distinguishing feature of the complaints and indictments
of suspects in the African Embassy bombings is the
use of the phrase "in the special maritime and territorial
jurisdiction of the United States, as that term is defined in
Title 18, United States Code, Section 7(3), and outside
the jurisdiction of any particular state or jurisdiction," to
apparently lay claim to the legal right of the US to arrest
and imprison terrorist suspects for acts in any location
where US law customarily would not be valid:
http://jya.com/alqfiles.htm
Would any of our legal advisors know the origin of that
phrase "outside the jurisdiction of any particular state or
jurisdiction?" Is this new, and devised to reduce conflict
with other states who may harbor terrorists, or perhaps
prevent them from being terrorist targets for cooperating
with the US?
Return to October 1998
Return to “John Young <jya@pipeline.com>”
1998-10-07 (Wed, 7 Oct 1998 23:05:00 +0800) - Nowhere Justice - John Young <jya@pipeline.com>