From: Michael Hohensee <mah248@is9.nyu.edu>
To: Jim Choate <ravage@einstein.ssz.com>
Message Hash: 2cb359076746d6e345157594d8a6e41dfe1ee21c303b9b99aa702a1d72eeda40
Message ID: <361CD086.CD3EB6F@is9.nyu.edu>
Reply To: <199810080256.VAA15750@einstein.ssz.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-10-08 15:11:15 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1998 23:11:15 +0800
From: Michael Hohensee <mah248@is9.nyu.edu>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1998 23:11:15 +0800
To: Jim Choate <ravage@einstein.ssz.com>
Subject: Re: I thought of an initialy regulated industry!... (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <199810080256.VAA15750@einstein.ssz.com>
Message-ID: <361CD086.CD3EB6F@is9.nyu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Jim Choate wrote:
>
> Forwarded message:
>
> > Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1998 22:08:08 -0400 (EDT)
> > From: Ryan Anderson <ryan@michonline.com>
> > Subject: Re: I thought of an initialy regulated industry!... (fwd)
>
> > > Consider the difference in volume of these two waste products...
> >
> >
> > Really? The amount of fuel that goes into a nuclear plant is farirly low,
> > compared to the amount shoved into a coal plant.
>
> Exactly my point.
>
> A 1000MW coal plant produces approx 300,000 tons of waste product per year.
> A nuclear plan produces .5. This means the concentration of the chemicals in
> the coal plant are much lower by many orders of magnitude than the nuclear,
> hence making the nuclear waste more toxic by a great deal.
>
The latter does not necessarily follow from the former. Consider the
example of natural gas and gasoline. You don't get to conclude your
argument that easily! :)
Michael Hohensee
Return to October 1998
Return to “Michael Hohensee <mah248@is9.nyu.edu>”