1998-10-28 - No Subject

Header Data

From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 2d454ee2e11886873b334510b8ab11d02a3c6a5ddc5dd5762328789f7c461f51
Message ID: <199810281735.SAA00677@replay.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-10-28 18:19:11 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 02:19:11 +0800

Raw message

From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 02:19:11 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: No Subject
Message-ID: <199810281735.SAA00677@replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 02:35 PM 10/27/98 -0800, Michael Motyka wrote:
>> Most of nature is a very high quality vacuum, actually.
>>
>Yup, I did my 100hrs of Physics, Chemistry and Math too. I like the way
>the 'vacuum' behaves near very hi-Z nuclei.

Fine, lets get into vacuum energy, but not waste cpunk time.


>More interesting, though, is this: why would a block cipher use key bits
>rather than an LFSR to do input or output whitening? Is it strictly a
>performance issue? Is it proven that doing this doesn't leak key bits in
>some way?

Shift registers are cracked.  Good ciphers haven't been.  (Love
tautologies.)  

Traditional block ciphers are expensive bleach, take note.
Unnecessary.  










  








Thread