1998-10-08 - Re: NT 5.0 and EFS – A victory for widespread use of crypto?

Header Data

From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Message Hash: 3bc158b0958b4bfda47bbd74e4bf47a3ec541176022a89deea64cd10152367f4
Message ID: <199810081610.SAA22577@replay.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-10-08 16:37:29 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1998 00:37:29 +0800

Raw message

From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1998 00:37:29 +0800
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Subject: Re: NT 5.0 and EFS -- A victory for widespread use of crypto?
Message-ID: <199810081610.SAA22577@replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



geeman@best.com writes:
> 
> EFS is being deployed because They realized that with NTFS-readers
> available for other OSes besides NT there was no longer even the illusion
> of security offered by the NT architecture.

This is all true. However, the manner in which you state it sounds
very much like a deliberate attempt to trash Microsoft and NT.

The fact is that the identical arguments could be made toward any of
the standard Unix-like and all other popular operating systems. Linux,
*BSD, Solaris, HP-UX, AIX, et al.--even where the vendors have a 
`trusted' version--are all susceptible to the same attacks. Hence, by 
your reasoning, one would have to say that the architectures of every 
one of these operating systems do not offer `even the illusion of 
security'.

 - Frondeur





Thread