1998-10-15 - Re: DNA
Header Data
From: “Marty Levy” <rwww60@email.sps.mot.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 62accf02cc4b08884f43ae5fab7d5f058b79561feddfea6b9cc1953eaa6d8512
Message ID: <3624C5C3.F563A50F@email.sps.mot.com>
Reply To: <000401bdf77a$fe720d00$932580d0@xasper8d>
UTC Datetime: 1998-10-15 01:35:04 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1998 09:35:04 +0800
Raw message
From: "Marty Levy" <rwww60@email.sps.mot.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1998 09:35:04 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: DNA
In-Reply-To: <000401bdf77a$fe720d00$932580d0@xasper8d>
Message-ID: <3624C5C3.F563A50F@email.sps.mot.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Because the fingerprint pattern is not genetically pre-determined. It is
apparently part of the fetal development process. Minor environmental
differences and random cell division differences will make the prints
different even between identical twins.
X wrote:
> DNA of identical siblings is identical? I guess that makes sense, since
> we're really split after conception... so explain why my brother has smooth
> hands and fingers with almost no prints (lucky bastard!) and mine look like
> mother teresa's face... (probably more now than before, eh?)
>
> X
>
Thread
Return to October 1998
- Return to “Leif Ericksen <leif@imho.net>”
- Return to ““Marty Levy” <rwww60@email.sps.mot.com>”
- Return to “Richard.Bragg@ssa.co.uk”
Return to ““X” <xasper8d@lobo.net>”
- 1998-10-14 (Wed, 14 Oct 1998 17:11:32 +0800) - RE: DNA - Richard.Bragg@ssa.co.uk