From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
To: cypherpunks@einstein.ssz.com
Message Hash: 9ab544189f69a8c3ebff6ea2866f63e0fec3e7266df7899e9a970ee0437cf814
Message ID: <199810302056.VAA31759@replay.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-10-30 21:29:52 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 31 Oct 1998 05:29:52 +0800
From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 1998 05:29:52 +0800
To: cypherpunks@einstein.ssz.com
Subject: No Subject
Message-ID: <199810302056.VAA31759@replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
From: Petro [SMTP:petro@playboy.com]
Sent: Friday, October 30, 1998 12:07 PM
To: cypherpunks@einstein.ssz.com
Subject: Re: FW: rules of engagement (fwd)
I am not sure, but is this an idea to put the 3 line RSA Perl
implementation in the classified adds? (as near as I could gather
trying to
read ahead) If not, what is it?
Yes. The reference was to the 3 line RSA Perl implementation in ads.
Didn't seem to get as an enthusiastic response as back in late summer.
me.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.0 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBNjnS1nUkEFXvH2ZAEQIYewCfbUfDHUF51IjAl1u2q1wC9JcWS7gAn325
V8c9VPuwEZmebGX2s9tJqkap
=CD5B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to October 1998
Return to “Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>”
1998-10-30 (Sat, 31 Oct 1998 05:29:52 +0800) - No Subject - Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>