1998-10-27 - Re: PRNGs and testers.

Header Data

From: Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@stud.uni-muenchen.de>
To: David Honig <honig@sprynet.com>
Message Hash: a3bedf8e4823f1e4fe65ff22ca73b672ad4e723d4eb8afa4500ee33ca6e866ed
Message ID: <36359051.574632A8@stud.uni-muenchen.de>
Reply To: <19981021151835.A26267@krdl.org.sg>
UTC Datetime: 1998-10-27 10:06:18 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1998 18:06:18 +0800

Raw message

From: Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@stud.uni-muenchen.de>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1998 18:06:18 +0800
To: David Honig <honig@sprynet.com>
Subject: Re: PRNGs and testers.
In-Reply-To: <19981021151835.A26267@krdl.org.sg>
Message-ID: <36359051.574632A8@stud.uni-muenchen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



David Honig wrote:
> 
> At 09:47 AM 10/26/98 +0100, Mok-Kong Shen wrote:

> >What if some PRNGs pass Maurer's test?

> I'd find it surprising if any did, given what I described.

I believe that there are quite a number. If I am allowed to cite 
my own stuff, a PRNG of my design did pass Maurer's test. See

     http://www.stud.uni-muenchen.de/~mok-kong.shen/#paper1
and
     http://www.stud.uni-muenchen.de/~mok-kong.shen/#paper9

M. K. Shen





Thread