1998-10-04 - Re: propose: `cypherpunks license’ (Re: Wanted: Twofish source code)

Header Data

From: Richard Stallman <rms@santafe.edu>
To: ben@algroup.co.uk
Message Hash: ace7bc12e2288f66ed901d98a091993aedcd860a4808de8649239c7df67106e3
Message ID: <199810042124.PAA06247@wijiji.santafe.edu>
Reply To: <199809281845.TAA18662@server.eternity.org>
UTC Datetime: 1998-10-04 08:24:33 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1998 16:24:33 +0800

Raw message

From: Richard Stallman <rms@santafe.edu>
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1998 16:24:33 +0800
To: ben@algroup.co.uk
Subject: Re: propose: `cypherpunks license' (Re: Wanted: Twofish source code)
In-Reply-To: <199809281845.TAA18662@server.eternity.org>
Message-ID: <199810042124.PAA06247@wijiji.santafe.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

    d) As far as I can work out, someone who wants to free part of a
    product, but not all of it, can't practically do so under GPL.

I'm not really sure what that means, but I have a feeling that there
is a misunderstanding at the root of it.  Could you describe the scenario
more clearly, so I could tell for certain?