1998-10-30 - Re: Shuffling (fwd)

Header Data

From: Jim Choate <ravage@EINSTEIN.ssz.com>
To: cypherpunks@EINSTEIN.ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Message Hash: bbd5279dd9853f314497d36e53e8f0dbe4235e3499f2516f59c64e9e1adb46de
Message ID: <199810301934.NAA26157@einstein.ssz.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-10-30 19:52:31 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 31 Oct 1998 03:52:31 +0800

Raw message

From: Jim Choate <ravage@EINSTEIN.ssz.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 1998 03:52:31 +0800
To: cypherpunks@EINSTEIN.ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Subject: Re: Shuffling (fwd)
Message-ID: <199810301934.NAA26157@einstein.ssz.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text



Forwarded message:

> From: iang@cs.berkeley.edu (Ian Goldberg)
> Subject: Re: Shuffling (fwd)
> Date: 30 Oct 1998 18:46:44 GMT

> >> o The resulting deck is then achieved by having cards fall from one or the
> >>     other of the two parts; a card will fall from one of the parts with
> >>     probability proportional to the number of cards remaining in the part.

> >It also doesn't address the problem of 'clumping' where a group of cards (ie
> >royal flush) stay together through the shuffling. This is the reason that
> >real dealers try for a 1-for-1 shuffle each time.
> 
> It actually _does_ address the normal, statistical clumping that goes on.
> It _doesn't_ address clumping that occurs because, say, you were playing
> poker while eating a peanut butter sandwich. :-)

What I was refering to was that let's say we've just finished playing a hand
of cards and the next dealer collects them from each player and stacks them
up prior to shuffling. Since the selection of cards is related to the
thickness of the two half-decks (and not a strict 1-to-1) it is reasonable
to expect an above average number of such shuffles (ones with grossly uneven
card counts, exactly what that would be I don't know), now as a player I'm
going to know about this bias and can use it to my advantage. I admit it
probably won't change the odds much but sometimes a few hundreths over a
long time can make a difference.

It seems to me the next question that needs asking is:

Given the probability model we've discussed what does the difference in
odds relating to clumping show in relation to uneven deck splitting. If
the deck is split even (26:26) v 27:25 v 28:24 v etc.


    ____________________________________________________________________
 
       To know what is right and not to do it is the worst cowardice.

                                                     Confucius

       The Armadillo Group       ,::////;::-.          James Choate
       Austin, Tx               /:'///// ``::>/|/      ravage@ssz.com
       www.ssz.com            .',  ||||    `/( e\      512-451-7087
                           -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'-
    --------------------------------------------------------------------





Thread