From: dporter@denova.com (D. Porter)
To: vin@shore.net (Vin McLellan)
Message Hash: c8bc33c34e539e9cfa431ab33358ab0fb1312d97b5362164a7df901ce84b40da
Message ID: <199810271107.39975@denova.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-10-27 17:44:23 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 01:44:23 +0800
From: dporter@denova.com (D. Porter)
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 01:44:23 +0800
To: vin@shore.net (Vin McLellan)
Subject: Re: files (was: Re: dbts, etc.)
Message-ID: <199810271107.39975@denova.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Steve Bellovin (smb@research.att.com) wrote...
> . . . to trace the the perturbations caused to the system. . .
> The more anonymity, and the more privacy cut-outs, the
> harder this is. . .
> To be sure, one can assert that the philosophical
> gains -- privacy, libertarianism, what have you -- are
> sufficiently important that this price is worth paying. . .
Steve, as you point out most of us are driven primarily by practical
concerns. This is a philosophy: pragmatism. Beyond mind exercise,
philosophy is valuable exactly to the extent it is practical.
DBS increases freedom. Increased freedom is practical because it reduces
risks -- of confiscation, imprisonment, and death -- and because it
usually increases efficiency. All of these pragmatic considerations seem
much more important than the ease of maintenance, at least to me.
Doug
Return to October 1998
Return to “dporter@denova.com (D. Porter)”
1998-10-27 (Wed, 28 Oct 1998 01:44:23 +0800) - Re: files (was: Re: dbts, etc.) - dporter@denova.com (D. Porter)