1998-11-11 - Re: charity at the point of a gun (Re: dbts: Privacy Fetishes, Perfect Foregone)(fwd)

Header Data

From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
To: Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
Message Hash: 01abda050a4fa2cfd98b420116b7e1d5d4626a1adeb7d22bce80f9b31371ded1
Message ID: <199811110544.GAA28375@replay.com>
Reply To: <199811100027.AAA07402@server.eternity.org>
UTC Datetime: 1998-11-11 06:18:11 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 14:18:11 +0800

Raw message

From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 14:18:11 +0800
To: Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: charity at the point of a gun (Re: dbts: Privacy Fetishes, Perfect  Foregone)(fwd)
In-Reply-To: <199811100027.AAA07402@server.eternity.org>
Message-ID: <199811110544.GAA28375@replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk> wrote:

> What is annoying is "charity" (social security) at the point of a gun.
> Our "conscience" is being decided by government which is acting as a
> broker for those lobby for their "need" and for your assets to be
> stolen and redistributed to them.
> 
> What people aren't willing to pay for shouldn't happen.  Period.  If
> that means people starve well those complaining loudest had better
> dig deeper into their pockets.

Imagine one of your kids had an accident and needed more expensive care
than you can pay for. Would you accept government "charity"?





Thread