From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
To: Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
Message Hash: 01abda050a4fa2cfd98b420116b7e1d5d4626a1adeb7d22bce80f9b31371ded1
Message ID: <199811110544.GAA28375@replay.com>
Reply To: <199811100027.AAA07402@server.eternity.org>
UTC Datetime: 1998-11-11 06:18:11 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 14:18:11 +0800
From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 14:18:11 +0800
To: Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: charity at the point of a gun (Re: dbts: Privacy Fetishes, Perfect Foregone)(fwd)
In-Reply-To: <199811100027.AAA07402@server.eternity.org>
Message-ID: <199811110544.GAA28375@replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk> wrote:
> What is annoying is "charity" (social security) at the point of a gun.
> Our "conscience" is being decided by government which is acting as a
> broker for those lobby for their "need" and for your assets to be
> stolen and redistributed to them.
>
> What people aren't willing to pay for shouldn't happen. Period. If
> that means people starve well those complaining loudest had better
> dig deeper into their pockets.
Imagine one of your kids had an accident and needed more expensive care
than you can pay for. Would you accept government "charity"?
Return to November 1998
Return to “Reeza! <howree@cable.navy.mil>”