From: lcs Mixmaster Remailer <mix@anon.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 1998 14:01:24 +0800
To: "paul h. merrill" <cypherpunks@EINSTEIN.ssz.com
Subject: Re: Re: Netscape AOL Instant Messenger Confirmation (kB3bEjeb1I aohels
Message-ID: <19981125052004.20490.qmail@nym.alias.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Do you even bother to read the posts you try to flame? Read the last part of
that.

Paul H. Merrill wrote:
>
>Again, some clueless asshole that can't tell the difference between
>solicited responses and Unsolicited spam mouths off.  If you would like
>to talk about someone, talk about the jerk who set up an AIM name using
>the outdated address, not the company that repsonded.
>
>PHM
>
>AKA PHMerrill@AOL.Com (among other names and addresses)
>
>Anonymous wrote:
>>
>> This does wonders for my opinion of AOL. Even the administration has no clue.
>>
>> AOL administration spammed the Cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com> list, using
>> an address for Cypherpunks which has been defunct for over a year now, with:
>>
>> >Thank you for registering for Netscape AOL Instant Messenger!
>> >
>> >Your registration for screen name aohelsux has been received.
>> >
>> >Please reply to this message within 48 hours to complete
>> >the registration process.  Simply reply to the present message
>> >and type 'OK' as the text of your message.
>>
>> P.S. "Well they just responded to an address someone gave them," like
>> certain advocates of AOL, lamers, and Microsoft we have on the list have
>> said, is not an excuse. It's easy to set up domain validation. The spammers
>> just don't care.