1998-11-11 - Re: IP: Clinton Wants Loophole In U.S. Free Speech Closed

Header Data

From: Reeza! <howree@cable.navy.mil>
To: b!X <cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: 7ee99657c6aaa25fa8b0818c3a99f1da6f93999eadfee69d15c9ad8eb0c12edb
Message ID: <3.0.5.32.19981111182325.00879d50@205.83.192.13>
Reply To: <199811102122.NAA18762@netcom13.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-11-11 08:47:00 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 16:47:00 +0800

Raw message

From: Reeza! <howree@cable.navy.mil>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 16:47:00 +0800
To: b!X <cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: IP: Clinton Wants Loophole In U.S. Free Speech Closed
In-Reply-To: <199811102122.NAA18762@netcom13.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.19981111182325.00879d50@205.83.192.13>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 07:25 PM 11/10/98 -0800, b!X wrote:
>Yeah yeah all very well and good parody except that the 2nd amendment
>contains the word "well-regulated" and the 1st doesn't. 

Observe: --begin pasted text--

Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech,
or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to
petition the Government for a redress of grievances.


Amendment II
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,
the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. 

--end pasted text--

While the 2nd does say "well regulated", it should also be pointed out that
the 1st does not say "right OF THE PEOPLE", except in the freedom of
assembly clause.

>(And yes I know I'm asking for a shitstorm of trouble saying that on THIS
>list of all places).

So why did you?

Reeza!

	If you see a man approaching you with the obvious intention 
	of doing you good, you should run for your life.
				-stolen from a cypherpunk sig





Thread