From: Steve Mynott <stevem@tightrope.demon.co.uk>
To: “Brown, R Ken” <frantz@netcom.com>
Message Hash: 887f7e27374e04de34e742ae80c77ff58b853e7151a39504c05ae40ce82f3678
Message ID: <19981116115915.A5751@tightrope.demon.co.uk>
Reply To: <896C7C3540C3D111AB9F00805FA78CE2013F858D@MSX11002>
UTC Datetime: 1998-11-16 12:20:28 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1998 20:20:28 +0800
From: Steve Mynott <stevem@tightrope.demon.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1998 20:20:28 +0800
To: "Brown, R Ken" <frantz@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: SIGH... NOT!! THC tainted oranges
In-Reply-To: <896C7C3540C3D111AB9F00805FA78CE2013F858D@MSX11002>
Message-ID: <19981116115915.A5751@tightrope.demon.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Mon, Nov 16, 1998 at 05:17:32AM -0600, Brown, R Ken wrote:
> Closest ciommon relative of hemp is of course hop (*Humulus lupulus*
> IIRC) which is, as you all know, widely used to flavour beer. I believe
> it already has some THC content, or something very similar.
lupulin ... I had a friend who claimed to get stoned off smoking hops
and hop extract.
There were inaccurate claims dating back to at least the 60s that hops
could be crossed with hemp to produce a psychoactive plant similar to
the recent Orange hoax.
--
1024/D9C69DF9 steve mynott steve@tightrope.demon.co.uk http://www.pineal.com/
the chief value of money lies in the fact that one lives in a world
in which it is overestimated. -- h. l. mencken
Return to November 1998
Return to “Steve Mynott <stevem@tightrope.demon.co.uk>”