1998-11-10 - Re: IP: Crunch Time for Y2K Suppliers (fwd)

Header Data

From: Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
To: declan@well.com
Message Hash: 8e097799cad32d0b4f29cb59bb4252935bfa74b764ea779c5fd7c59e4bbe4ad7
Message ID: <199811092255.WAA06718@server.eternity.org>
Reply To: <199811090310.TAA18290@smtp.well.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-11-10 00:33:57 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1998 08:33:57 +0800

Raw message

From: Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1998 08:33:57 +0800
To: declan@well.com
Subject: Re: IP: Crunch Time for Y2K Suppliers (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <199811090310.TAA18290@smtp.well.com>
Message-ID: <199811092255.WAA06718@server.eternity.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




Declan McCullagh writes:
> I'm not sure I like intellectual property laws in general -- like some
> libertarians, I might prefer a contract-based system. But for now I support
> civil laws to punish copyright infringements, and it seems to me it's
> difficult to argue that redistributing entire articles isn't one.

Ah good -- I thought you'd taken leave of your cypherpunkly senses for
a moment there!  (re my `fuck copyright' post).

> Besides, and more importantly, it's also rude.

That it might be, if it is a social says that it is polite to honor
peoples requests about bit flow.

But hey, if more and more people find ignoring the supposed social
convention convenient, then perhaps this social convention isn't as
widely adhered to as people making money off subsidized copyright
enforcement thugs might like to claim it is.  ie. IMO social
conventions on copyright are moving, and quite fast.  And copyright
has a hidden cost which we are all paying for.

Adam





Thread