1998-11-01 - Re: info PGP from France

Header Data

From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: 9659d0afd520c5db8f8ef2630814c4256050c73896b0480384f0330387082eb4
Message ID: <199811011544.QAA25390@replay.com>
Reply To: <Version.32.19981101131054.00eed100@mail.capway.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-11-01 16:16:42 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 2 Nov 1998 00:16:42 +0800

Raw message

From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 1998 00:16:42 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: info PGP from France
In-Reply-To: <Version.32.19981101131054.00eed100@mail.capway.com>
Message-ID: <199811011544.QAA25390@replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



  > The PGP 6.0 Manual is available in french

Y'know, I have yet to see a rational (non-marketing-speak) explanation
of the advantages of switching to PGP 6.0...

PGP 5.x appears to have no advantages over 2.6x, but when Windoze
users began to "upgrade" to it, we had to rewrite our mailing list
code, as -- of course -- it's mostly incompatible with 2.6x.

Its other primary features -- public keys the size of Mack trucks,
dog-slow decryption rates, and more complicated key management --
hardly count as advantages.

So what's 6.0 got?  Total incompatibility with previous versions?
10 MB executables?  An additional bloatware serving "on the side"?

Pah!  It looks as if PGP today has more in common with Micro$oft Turd
than the nice little "privacy for the masses" programme Phil wrote.





Thread