From: Information Security <guy@panix.com>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: a177a64d76beb408bfd1e45a23e7d8501f04ae057045a600a1b253b528cbd2d9
Message ID: <199811071956.OAA15936@panix7.panix.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-11-07 20:16:17 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1998 04:16:17 +0800
From: Information Security <guy@panix.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1998 04:16:17 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: A question about the new ISP ruling and email...
Message-ID: <199811071956.OAA15936@panix7.panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> From: Jim Choate <ravage@EINSTEIN.ssz.com>
>
> Hi,
>
> I was pondering the draconian implications of the requirement to register
> ISP's. Would an email only site be an ISP under these regulations?
I dunno.
But I've begun netcopping the Ignition-Point list on
an ongoing basis (starting Friday), and they'll be
an interesting test case of whether what they're
doing is "fair use".
Pobox.com/listbox.com is reluctantly assigning a person
to receive (my) copyright complaints, and will register
themselves with the FCO.
I like to post whole articles myself.
Anyway, for a test case, better them than me.
---guy ;-)
Return to November 1998
Return to “Information Security <guy@panix.com>”
1998-11-07 (Sun, 8 Nov 1998 04:16:17 +0800) - Re: A question about the new ISP ruling and email… - Information Security <guy@panix.com>