1998-11-26 - Re: Article V - an analysis (fwd)

Header Data

From: Todd Larason <jtl@molehill.org>
To: “Douglas L. Peterson” <cypherpunks@Algebra.COM>
Message Hash: a89329bef61c220b49198201e642d1f993ab31ea8735b649a010963b92ed6cdc
Message ID: <19981125173059.A10113@molehill.org>
Reply To: <199811252328.RAA31856@einstein.ssz.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-11-26 01:57:28 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 26 Nov 1998 09:57:28 +0800

Raw message

From: Todd Larason <jtl@molehill.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 1998 09:57:28 +0800
To: "Douglas L. Peterson" <cypherpunks@Algebra.COM>
Subject: Re: Article V - an analysis (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <199811252328.RAA31856@einstein.ssz.com>
Message-ID: <19981125173059.A10113@molehill.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



On 981126, Douglas L. Peterson wrote:
> The Articles of Confederation 
> Article XIII.
> 
> ... And the Articles of this Confederation shall
> be inviolably observed by every state, and the union shall be
> perpetual; nor shall any alteration at any time hereafter be made
> in any of them; unless such alteration be agreed to in a Congress
> of the United States, and be afterwards confirmed by the legislatures
> of every State.

> The convention, the States, and the current Congress did as was
> required under Article XIII.

The Convention did not.  It produced a document which, by ITS rules, went
into effect after having been ratified by 9 of 13 states, not all 13 as
required by Article XIII.
-- 
ICQ UIN: 55350095





Thread