From: “Harvey Rook (Exchange)” <hrook@exchange.microsoft.com>
To: “‘Eric Cordian’” <cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: b0919287bab36a92cfb4838e8c1fc3bb14ae424cace6e914c2f2512c7055b6f7
Message ID: <2FBF98FC7852CF11912A0000000000010D19AD69@DINO>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-11-13 22:27:01 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1998 06:27:01 +0800
From: "Harvey Rook (Exchange)" <hrook@exchange.microsoft.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1998 06:27:01 +0800
To: "'Eric Cordian'" <cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: RE: Rivest Patent
Message-ID: <2FBF98FC7852CF11912A0000000000010D19AD69@DINO>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
It's a little bit more complicated than that. RC-6, which also uses data
dependant rotations is patent free.
Harv.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Cordian [mailto:emc@wire.insync.net]
> Sent: Friday, November 13, 1998 11:25 AM
> To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
> Subject: Re: Rivest Patent
>
>
> JYA writes:
>
> > Ron Rivest received on November 10 "US Patent 5835600:
> > Block encryption algorithm with data-dependent rotations:"
> > http://jya.com/rivest111098.htm (22K)
>
> So we can't use the rotate instruction with a data-dependent shift
> count in a block encryption algorithm without a license from Ron?
>
> Foo on that.
>
> --
> Sponsor the DES Analytic Crack Project
> http://www.cyberspace.org/~enoch/crakfaq.html
>
Return to November 1998
Return to ““Harvey Rook (Exchange)” <hrook@exchange.microsoft.com>”