From: Jim Choate <ravage@EINSTEIN.ssz.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1998 04:05:35 +0800
To: cypherpunks@EINSTEIN.ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Subject: Identification and Privacy are not Antinomies (fwd)
Message-ID: <199811071943.NAA02441@einstein.ssz.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text



Forwarded message:

> Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1998 20:26:24 +0100
> From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
> Subject: Identification and Privacy are not Antinomies

> Am I a UK citizen, a good credit risk, a club member in good
> standing, etc.  An appropriate mechanism, a smartcard, can easily 
> authenticate both itself (challenge-response) and the bearer via a biometric 
> and/or PIN without revealing the identity of the holder.
> 
> However, who holds out hope that such a sensible
> thing would ever be adopted by the powers-that-be.

What the powers-that-be hold is realy irrelevant. The issue is what do we do
to make sure that the powers-that-are-to-be don't have that option?


    ____________________________________________________________________
 
       To know what is right and not to do it is the worst cowardice.

                                                     Confucius

       The Armadillo Group       ,::////;::-.          James Choate
       Austin, Tx               /:'///// ``::>/|/      ravage@ssz.com
       www.ssz.com            .',  ||||    `/( e\      512-451-7087
                           -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'-
    --------------------------------------------------------------------