1998-11-25 - Re: OpenPGP / S/MIME Interoperability
Header Data
From: Frank Brueckner <Frank.Brueckner@mch.sni.de>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: cd1ae45e002b369263dcd94cb977e9632007ae799e12967a64c91ab39ed048ae
Message ID: <365BB786.4C2E2448@mch.sni.de>
Reply To: <199811242259.WAA04469@server.eternity.org>
UTC Datetime: 1998-11-25 08:19:58 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 25 Nov 1998 16:19:58 +0800
Raw message
From: Frank Brueckner <Frank.Brueckner@mch.sni.de>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 1998 16:19:58 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: OpenPGP / S/MIME Interoperability
In-Reply-To: <199811242259.WAA04469@server.eternity.org>
Message-ID: <365BB786.4C2E2448@mch.sni.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Adam Back reported that Jon Callas wrote:
> [...] there is no reason why you can't have PGP
> messages backed by X.509 certificates, and it is trivial to use S/MIME
> with OpenPGP certificates. I'm planning on writing a short
> informational RFC on how to do it once we all get RFC numbers for our
> respective systems.
It wouldn't be bad to include this activity in the discussion hosted by
<pgp-directory@dante.net>.
Am I right ?
Regards
Frank Brckner
Siemens Information and Communication Networks
Directory Team http://www.siemensmeta.com/
Thread
Return to November 1998
- Return to “Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>”
- Return to “Frank Brueckner <Frank.Brueckner@mch.sni.de>”
Return to “Jan Dobrucki <s1180@qmail.pjwstk.waw.pl>”
- 1998-11-25 (Wed, 25 Nov 1998 08:00:34 +0800) - open-pgp / s/mime interoperability - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
- 1998-11-25 (Wed, 25 Nov 1998 16:19:58 +0800) - Re: OpenPGP / S/MIME Interoperability - Frank Brueckner <Frank.Brueckner@mch.sni.de>
- 1998-11-25 (Thu, 26 Nov 1998 07:44:50 +0800) - Re: open-pgp / s/mime interoperability - Jan Dobrucki <s1180@qmail.pjwstk.waw.pl>