1998-11-28 - Re: native onani

Header Data

From: Reeza! <howree@cable.navy.mil>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: e67dcc04d86b282e91338cd601f7d83a49aa84053c973a55eb3bdb29d61f4b1c
Message ID: <3.0.5.32.19981129071146.00881b40@205.83.192.13>
Reply To: <199811281632.RAA12035@replay.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-11-28 22:40:52 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 29 Nov 1998 06:40:52 +0800

Raw message

From: Reeza! <howree@cable.navy.mil>
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 1998 06:40:52 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: native onani
In-Reply-To: <199811281632.RAA12035@replay.com>
Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.19981129071146.00881b40@205.83.192.13>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 05:32 PM 11/28/98 +0100, Anonymous wrote:
>
>At 07:24 AM 11/27/98 -0500, Robert Hettinga wrote:
>> Obviously
>>neither homosexual nor homophobic, both groups
>>prefer the chaste option of onani (onanism) to the perceived compromises of
>>marital consummation.
>
>
>Worse than that, they use a geijing word for masturbation...
>
>
>--If the spice girls mud-wrestled shonen knife, who would win?
>

Vince McMahon.





Reeza!

	If you see a man approaching you with the obvious intention 
	of doing you good, you should run for your life.

				-stolen from a cypherpunk sig





Thread