1998-11-08 - Re: Response to Anonymous re: Zero-Knowledge Freedom

Header Data

From: Alex de Joode <usura@replay.com>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: f1226add9aa6030808c93b60ab68141f6fdb816b71e5f831737d0348fcfde5af
Message ID: <199811081325.OAA13192@replay.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-11-08 13:58:46 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1998 21:58:46 +0800

Raw message

From: Alex de Joode <usura@replay.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1998 21:58:46 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: Response to Anonymous re: Zero-Knowledge Freedom
Message-ID: <199811081325.OAA13192@replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Anonymous,

[..]
: >FREEDOM servers in their home country (example: if terrible laws are
: >passed like in the Netherlands requiring logging and storage of all
: >packet info., etc.). In this manner, a local user in a restrictive

I'm not aware of any law that requires "logging and storage of all
packet info". (I presume you mean 'Wet Computercriminaliteit II' ?)

There is a part that makes ISP liable if they cannot point to a
'user' but the law explicitly states that you have to be in
the business of being an ISP, running a remailer is not my business,
it is a 'not for profit' hobby, so it will be fun to see how "they"
will 'manouvre' to bring that also under the law ...

Anyways could you please sent me the relevant parts of this law that 
lead you think this way ?

bEST Regards,
--
Alex de Joode | International CryptoRunners | http://www.replay.com
         'A little paranoia can lengthen your life'





Thread