1998-11-19 - Re: Goldbach’s Conjecture - a question about prime sums of odd (fwd)

Header Data

From: Jim Choate <ravage@EINSTEIN.ssz.com>
To: cypherpunks@EINSTEIN.ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Message Hash: fbba99fa71d100499af53ffb5317d4130e28e6100d4bc202f9e288bab35231aa
Message ID: <199811191719.LAB04034@einstein.ssz.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-11-19 17:50:54 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1998 01:50:54 +0800

Raw message

From: Jim Choate <ravage@EINSTEIN.ssz.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1998 01:50:54 +0800
To: cypherpunks@EINSTEIN.ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Subject: Re: Goldbach's Conjecture - a question about prime sums of odd (fwd)
Message-ID: <199811191719.LAB04034@einstein.ssz.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text



Forwarded message:

> Subject: Re: Goldbach's Conjecture - a question about prime sums of odd
> Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1998 10:53:50 -0600 (CST)
> From: ichudov@Algebra.Com (Igor Chudov @ home)

> I have no idea where you heard it, but primes are numbers greater than 1,
> by definition.

Actualy a prime is any number which has no multiplicitave factors other than
itself and 1.

Does that mean negatives can't be prime numbers?

So, -3 breaks down to:

-3 * 1 = -3; 3 * -1 would be another set of factors so negatives can't be
primes in the strictest sense.




    ____________________________________________________________________
 
            Lawyers ask the wrong questions when they don't want
            the right answers.

                                        Scully (X-Files)

       The Armadillo Group       ,::////;::-.          James Choate
       Austin, Tx               /:'///// ``::>/|/      ravage@ssz.com
       www.ssz.com            .',  ||||    `/( e\      512-451-7087
                           -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'-
    --------------------------------------------------------------------





Thread