From: "William H. Geiger III" <whgiii@openpgp.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1998 11:06:25 +0800
To: Reeza! <howree@cable.navy.mil>
Subject: Re: PGP Inc has gone to the dogs
In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.19981212031015.00a74d90@205.83.192.13>
Message-ID: <199812120127.UAA005.88@whgiii>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In <3.0.5.32.19981212031015.00a74d90@205.83.192.13>, on 12/12/98 
   at 03:10 AM, Reeza! <howree@cable.navy.mil> said:

>Cleaning out the dross, I found this.

>What was "broken" in pgp50?


In doing my port of 5.0 to OS/2 I found and patched a couple of minor bugs
in pgp, none of them security related. I don't know what Adam is refering
to as "broken" except perhaps the change in the commandline so 5.0 doesn't
work with 2.6.x scripts & plugins.



>At 10:16 AM 10/18/98 +0100, Adam Back wrote:
>>
>>PGP Inc has taken leave of it's sense.  Masses of untrue claims on web
>>pages (take a look at examples below), no RSA support, no unix
>>versions (other than old broken pgp50).


- -- 
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
William H. Geiger III  http://www.openpgp.net
Geiger Consulting    Cooking With Warp 4.0

Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice
PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail.
OS/2 PGP 5.0 at: http://www.openpgp.net/pgp.html
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
 
Tag-O-Matic: DOS=HIGH? I knew it was on something...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i OS/2 for non-commercial use
Comment: Registered_User_E-Secure_v1.1b1_ES000000
Charset: cp850

wj8DBQE2cbiMlHpjA6A1ypsRApwYAJ9/JOVfvaFqCWH4z9pE8ntBQyn3qwCgj7Uo
GzSrbEYZoWwbGM1u2zJSwHY=
=s57Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----