From: Kevlar <webmaster@max-web.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 16540404b022e282a7a60dde7457cc91673b2c5fd65d31ca996d529327cb5441
Message ID: <3.0.6.32.19981231021342.007e9300@max-web.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-12-31 10:32:15 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 18:32:15 +0800
From: Kevlar <webmaster@max-web.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 18:32:15 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: True Random Numbers
Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.19981231021342.007e9300@max-web.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Several months ago, someone was talking about "True random numbers" and how
to obtain them, and I (rather ignorantly) suggested they run a recorded
sound through a program to record a 1 for every peak of volume over a
certian threshold , and a 0 for every thing quieter.(I think i suggested a
russeling tree, or a waterfall) Just adjust the threshold according to the
volume of your sampling. (it was clear in my mind, even if I can't explain
it here)
Little did I know...
Read phrack 54.5.
-Kevlar
<Webmaster@max-web.com>
Does God know Peano Algebra? Or does she not care if strong atheists
couldnt reason their way out of a trap made of Boolean presumptions?
A little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing, but zero knowlege is
absolutely subversive.
Overspecialization breeds in weakness. It's a slow death.
Beat your algorithms into swords, your dumb terminals into shields, and
turn virtual machines into battlefields... Let the weak say, "I am strong"
and question authority.
Return to December 1998
Return to “Kevlar <webmaster@max-web.com>”
1998-12-31 (Thu, 31 Dec 1998 18:32:15 +0800) - True Random Numbers - Kevlar <webmaster@max-web.com>