From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 18c20b39bae835197c2edd67a4ae802c0a7887b008f51710d898fbd75f5bacd6
Message ID: <199812031421.PAA00408@replay.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-12-03 14:54:54 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 3 Dec 1998 22:54:54 +0800
From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 1998 22:54:54 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: No Subject
Message-ID: <199812031421.PAA00408@replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Is anyone aware of any critical evaluations
performed on the security of the Network Associates
(a.k.a. McAfee) PGP for Personal Privacy? Traditionally,
PGP source code has always been available for
evaluation by the Net community, but this isn't the
case with the newer commercial versions.
Additionally, and this is a bit paranoid, but PGP in
the past has come with digitally signed files to
authenticate the integrity of the files. Once again,
commercial versions offer no such guarantee that the
software hasn't been tampered with between the factory
and the store shelves.
Comments?
Return to December 1998
Return to “Steve Mynott <steve@tightrope.demon.co.uk>”