From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
 To: cypherpunks@toad.com
 Message Hash: 18c20b39bae835197c2edd67a4ae802c0a7887b008f51710d898fbd75f5bacd6
 Message ID: <199812031421.PAA00408@replay.com>
 Reply To: N/A
 UTC Datetime: 1998-12-03 14:54:54 UTC
 Raw Date: Thu, 3 Dec 1998 22:54:54 +0800
From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 1998 22:54:54 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: No Subject
Message-ID: <199812031421.PAA00408@replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Is anyone aware of any critical evaluations 
performed on the security of the Network Associates 
(a.k.a. McAfee) PGP for Personal Privacy?  Traditionally, 
PGP source code has always been available for 
evaluation by the Net community, but this isn't the 
case with the newer commercial versions.
Additionally, and this is a bit paranoid, but PGP in 
the past has come with digitally signed files to 
authenticate the integrity of the files.  Once again, 
commercial versions offer no such guarantee that the 
software hasn't been tampered with between the factory 
and the store shelves.
Comments?
        
Return to December 1998
Return to “Steve Mynott <steve@tightrope.demon.co.uk>”