1998-12-01 - Re: New Brady Bill Implications

Header Data

From: Steve Schear <schear@lvcm.com>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: 1e9289e8bd3be0ae923111359ab965648f179348a5c6c95fc9b58310c4c77719
Message ID: <v04003a00b289da243335@[24.1.50.17]>
Reply To: <3.0.2.32.19981201022809.00743bf4@pop.primenet.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-12-01 20:17:26 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 2 Dec 1998 04:17:26 +0800

Raw message

From: Steve Schear <schear@lvcm.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 1998 04:17:26 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: New Brady Bill Implications
In-Reply-To: <3.0.2.32.19981201022809.00743bf4@pop.primenet.com>
Message-ID: <v04003a00b289da243335@[24.1.50.17]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>I'm watching Headline News, and they are reporting
>that "now", under new provisions in the Brady Bill,
>and 'instant' background check is being made. This
>even is for simple rifles and shotguns.

How does this affect private, that is non-dealer, gun sales (like at swap
meets)?

--Steve

Thread

• Return to December 1998

• Return to “Carol Anne Cypherpunk <carolann@censored.org>”
• Return to “Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>”
• Return to “Frederick Burroughs <riburr@shentel.net>”
• Return to “Lucky Green <shamrock@cypherpunks.to>”
• Return to “Steve Schear <schear@lvcm.com>”

• Return to “Tim May <tcmay@got.net>”

• 1998-12-01 (Tue, 1 Dec 1998 16:54:21 +0800) - New Brady Bill Implications - Carol Anne Cypherpunk <carolann@censored.org>
  • 1998-12-01 (Wed, 2 Dec 1998 04:17:26 +0800) - Re: New Brady Bill Implications - Steve Schear <schear@lvcm.com>
    • 1998-12-01 (Wed, 2 Dec 1998 06:06:40 +0800) - Re: New Brady Bill Implications - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
    • 1998-12-01 (Wed, 2 Dec 1998 07:43:03 +0800) - Re: New Brady Bill Implications - Frederick Burroughs <riburr@shentel.net>
    • 1998-12-02 (Wed, 2 Dec 1998 09:17:18 +0800) - Re: New Brady Bill Implications - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
    • 1998-12-02 (Wed, 2 Dec 1998 09:24:29 +0800) - Re: New Brady Bill Implications - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
  • 1998-12-01 (Wed, 2 Dec 1998 04:23:44 +0800) - Re: New Brady Bill Implications - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
    • 1998-12-02 (Wed, 2 Dec 1998 08:48:52 +0800) - Re: New Brady Bill Implications - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
      • 1998-12-02 (Wed, 2 Dec 1998 13:35:39 +0800) - Re: New Brady Bill Implications - Lucky Green <shamrock@cypherpunks.to>